Technology Law: Trademarks and Copyright Protection
circuits
Newsletter Site Map Contact us Search this Site Home
 

March 16, 2011

Fraud is hard to prove

Filed under: Factual Analysis,Fraud on the PTO,intent to use,trademarks for boardgames — Tags: — Trademark Law Briefs @ 9:57 am

Spin Master, Ltd. v. Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC, 2011 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 25261

This is an exciting sequel to the Would You Rather… 9th Cir. decision I wrote about last year.  In that case, the 9th Cir. said the district court erred in granting a cancellation based on descriptiveness.  This meant defendant’s other grounds for summary judgment- fraud on the PTO- needed to be considered after all.

This decision illustrates just how difficult it is to prove a subjective intent to mislead the PTO in an application (though, to be fair, this didn’t appear to be a particularly close case based on the facts the district court lays out). 

Trademark Law Briefs Trademark Law Briefs

   
   
 

© COPYRIGHT 2006-2011 DANIEL A. BATTERMAN. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

   
Our Philosophy
About Technology Law
Contracts
E-Mail Law
Intellectual Property
Licensing
Open Source Software Law
Outsourcing Law
Privacy Law
Software & IT Development Law
Website Audits
Other Law Practice Areas
Litigation
Articles
Cases & Statutes
About Attorney Batterman
Location
Disclaimers
 


Old City Hall, 45 School Street, 3rd Floor, Boston MA 02108     617.259.1600     DBatterman@BattermanLaw.com