Technology Law: Trademarks and Copyright Protection
circuits
Newsletter Site Map Contact us Search this Site Home
 

April 11, 2012

DAILY: Creation of advertising material by third party does not constitute infringement

Filed under: Daily,Unfair use,dilution — Tags: — World Trademark Review @ 5:00 pm

In National Business Forms and Printing Inc v Ford Motor Co, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that a commercial printer company that offered reproduction of trademark-protected corporate logos for use in custom design and printing services did not use the marks in commerce, as required for a finding of trademark infringement under federal law.

World Trademark Review World Trademark Review

April 3, 2012

DAILY: Ninth Circuit accepts declaration testimony as proof of materiality of false advertising

Filed under: Daily,Unfair use — Tags: — World Trademark Review @ 5:00 pm

Traditionally, plaintiffs seeking to prove the materiality of allegedly misleading advertising have had to do so through the results of expensive and time-consuming surveys. However, in Skydive Ariz Inc v Quattrocchi, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has departed from this rule, in the process producing a rare opinion unambiguously accepting declaration testimony as proof of materiality.

World Trademark Review World Trademark Review

March 29, 2012

DAILY: Supreme Administrative Court upholds unfair competition fine

Filed under: Daily,Unfair use — Tags: — World Trademark Review @ 5:00 pm

The Supreme Administrative Court has upheld a decision of the Commission for the Protection of Competition to impose a fine on Bulgarian cosmetics manufacturer TSH Cosmetics for producing and selling children’s shampoo that was similar to that produced by Bulgaria’s oldest cosmetics company, Alen Mak.

World Trademark Review World Trademark Review

March 28, 2012

DAILY: Supreme Court issues controversial decision on ‘genuine use’ of company name

Filed under: Daily,Unfair use — Tags: — World Trademark Review @ 5:00 pm

The Supreme Court has issued its decision in a dispute between NonStop Television, which manages a television channel called TV 7, and a company registered as TV 7 Stockholm AB over the latter’s use of its company name. The guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court in this case establish a fundamentally new approach to the requirement of ‘genuine use’ for companies.

World Trademark Review World Trademark Review

February 28, 2012

DAILY: BMW: another victorious ride in the battle to protect its marks

Filed under: Confusion,Daily,Unfair use — Tags: — World Trademark Review @ 5:00 pm

After winning a landmark IP case against Century Baoma in 2009 at the Hunan Supreme People’s Court, German car manufacturer BMW has won another case at the Beijing Number 2 Intermediate People’s Court against a Chinese company which appears to be related to Century Baoma.

World Trademark Review World Trademark Review

DAILY: BMW: another victorious ride in the battle to protect its marks

Filed under: Confusion,Daily,Unfair use — Tags: — World Trademark Review @ 5:00 pm

After winning a landmark IP case against Century Baoma in 2009 at the Hunan Supreme People’s Court, German car manufacturer BMW has won another case at the Beijing Number 2 Intermediate People’s Court against a Chinese company which appears to be related to Century Baoma.

World Trademark Review World Trademark Review

February 26, 2012

DAILY: Supreme Court decision shows clear tendency to favour free competition principle

Filed under: Daily,Unfair use — Tags: — World Trademark Review @ 5:00 pm

In DentalCare – Centro de Medicina Dentária Lda v Dental Link Consultoria de Gestão Lda, the Supreme Court has held that the likelihood of confusion between two DENTAL CARE marks and the corporate name Dental Care was practically non-existent. The decision shows that the courts are likely to consider that a certain degree of likelihood of confusion is compatible with fair competition.

World Trademark Review World Trademark Review

February 15, 2012

DAILY: ASA orders Woolworths to withdraw use of advertising slogan

Filed under: Daily,Unfair use — Tags: — World Trademark Review @ 5:00 pm

The Advertising Standards Authority has ruled that retailer Woolworths (Pty) Ltd must stop using the phrase ‘good old fashioned’, as it imitates beverage manufacturer Frankie’s Olde Soft Drinks’ ‘good old fashioned soft drinks’ advertising slogan. Woolworths had argued that the phrases ‘old fashioned’ or ‘good old fashioned’ are descriptive and do not qualify as advertising property.

World Trademark Review World Trademark Review

January 26, 2012

DAILY: Rounded fuchsia cross does not imitate Red Cross emblem

Filed under: Daily,Unfair use — Tags: — World Trademark Review @ 5:00 pm

The Barcelona Court of Appeal has dismissed a civil complaint filed by the Spanish Red Cross against Happy Pills SL, a confectionery distributor, for infringement of its rights in the Red Cross emblem. Among other things, the court found that the defendant’s rounded fuchsia cross did not constitute an imitation of the Red Cross.

World Trademark Review World Trademark Review

November 16, 2011

DAILY: Rejection of company name based on famous mark will be exceptional

Filed under: Daily,Unfair use — Tags: — World Trademark Review @ 5:00 pm

The Inspección de Personas Jurídicas, the authority in charge of approving the incorporation of legal entities, has, for the first time, dealt with a conflict between a company name and a trademark. Even though it did not actually decide on the conflict itself, it stated that the notoriety of the mark must be “objectively known” and that the rejection of a company name on this ground would be exceptional.

World Trademark Review World Trademark Review

Newer Posts »

   
   
 

© COPYRIGHT 2006-2011 DANIEL A. BATTERMAN. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

   
Our Philosophy
About Technology Law
Contracts
E-Mail Law
Intellectual Property
Licensing
Open Source Software Law
Outsourcing Law
Privacy Law
Software & IT Development Law
Website Audits
Other Law Practice Areas
Litigation
Articles
Cases & Statutes
About Attorney Batterman
Location
Disclaimers
 


Old City Hall, 45 School Street, 3rd Floor, Boston MA 02108     617.259.1600     DBatterman@BattermanLaw.com